Grok 4.7 vs Qwen3.8 Flash
A side-by-side comparison of Grok 4.7 from xAI and Qwen3.8 Flash from Qwen, using published pricing, context windows, supported inputs, and release dates.
- Grok 4.7 input
- $2
- Qwen3.8 Flash input
- $0.15
Key differences
Qwen3.8 Flash is 93% cheaper on input tokens ($0.15 vs $2 per 1M).
Qwen3.8 Flash has the larger context window: 1M vs 500K tokens.
Grok 4.7 is the newer release (Sep 21, 2026, vs Aug 26, 2026).
Grok 4.7 vs Qwen3.8 Flash specs
| Spec | Grok 4.7 | Qwen3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Qwen |
| Released | Sep 21, 2026 | Aug 26, 2026 |
| Context window | 500,000 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens |
| Input price / 1M tokens | $2 | $0.15 |
| Output price / 1M tokens | $6 | $0.47 |
| 10K in + 1K out request | $0.026 | $0.002 |
| Accepts | file, image, text | image, text, video |
| Produces | text | text |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured outputs | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Popularity | 35/100 | 37/100 |
Highlighted values are better on that spec: lower price, larger context window, newer release, or higher popularity. Prices in USD per 1M tokens as listed on OpenRouter.
Grok 4.7 vs Qwen3.8 Flash questions
Is Grok 4.7 or Qwen3.8 Flash cheaper?
Qwen3.8 Flash has the lower listed input price ($0.15 per million tokens). For a request with 10,000 input and 1,000 output tokens, Grok 4.7 costs about $0.026 and Qwen3.8 Flash about $0.002.
Which has the larger context window?
Qwen3.8 Flash supports 1,000,000 tokens, the larger of the two.
Which model should I choose?
Pick the cheaper model for high-volume, simpler tasks, and test both on a sample of your real prompts before committing. Price and context size do not measure output quality on your specific workload.