DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Qwen3.8 Flash
A side-by-side comparison of DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 from DeepSeek and Qwen3.8 Flash from Qwen, using published pricing, context windows, supported inputs, and release dates.
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 input
- $0.3
- Qwen3.8 Flash input
- $0.15
Key differences
Qwen3.8 Flash is 50% cheaper on input tokens ($0.15 vs $0.3 per 1M).
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has the larger context window: 1.05M vs 1M tokens.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is the newer release (Oct 17, 2026, vs Aug 26, 2026).
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Qwen3.8 Flash specs
| Spec | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 | Qwen3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Qwen |
| Released | Oct 17, 2026 | Aug 26, 2026 |
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens |
| Input price / 1M tokens | $0.3 | $0.15 |
| Output price / 1M tokens | $1.2 | $0.47 |
| 10K in + 1K out request | $0.0042 | $0.002 |
| Accepts | image, text | image, text, video |
| Produces | text | text |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured outputs | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Popularity | 65/100 | 37/100 |
Highlighted values are better on that spec: lower price, larger context window, newer release, or higher popularity. Prices in USD per 1M tokens as listed on OpenRouter.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Qwen3.8 Flash questions
Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Qwen3.8 Flash cheaper?
Qwen3.8 Flash has the lower listed input price ($0.15 per million tokens). For a request with 10,000 input and 1,000 output tokens, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs about $0.0042 and Qwen3.8 Flash about $0.002.
Which has the larger context window?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 supports 1,048,576 tokens, the larger of the two.
Which model should I choose?
Pick the cheaper model for high-volume, simpler tasks, and test both on a sample of your real prompts before committing. Price and context size do not measure output quality on your specific workload.