AtlasAI Center AI tool intelligence
AI model comparison

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

A side-by-side comparison of Gemini 3.8 Flash from Google and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 from DeepSeek, using published pricing, context windows, supported inputs, and release dates.

Gemini 3.8 Flash input
$0.825
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 input
$0.3
At a glance

Key differences

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 64% cheaper on input tokens ($0.3 vs $0.825 per 1M).

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is the newer release (Oct 17, 2026, vs Sep 2, 2026).

Side by side

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 specs

SpecGemini 3.8 FlashDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
ProviderGoogleDeepSeek
ReleasedSep 2, 2026Oct 17, 2026
Context window1,048,576 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Input price / 1M tokens$0.825$0.3
Output price / 1M tokens$4.13$1.2
10K in + 1K out request$0.012$0.0042
Acceptsaudio, file, image, text, videoimage, text
Producestexttext
Tool callingYesYes
Structured outputsYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Popularity39/10065/100

Highlighted values are better on that spec: lower price, larger context window, newer release, or higher popularity. Prices in USD per 1M tokens as listed on OpenRouter.

FAQ

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 questions

Is Gemini 3.8 Flash or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 cheaper?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has the lower listed input price ($0.3 per million tokens). For a request with 10,000 input and 1,000 output tokens, Gemini 3.8 Flash costs about $0.012 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 about $0.0042.

Which model should I choose?

Pick the cheaper model for high-volume, simpler tasks, and test both on a sample of your real prompts before committing. Price and context size do not measure output quality on your specific workload.