AtlasAI Center AI tool intelligence
AI model comparison

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash

A side-by-side comparison of Claude Opus 5.5 from Anthropic and Gemini 3.8 Flash from Google, using published pricing, context windows, supported inputs, and release dates.

Claude Opus 5.5 input
$4
Gemini 3.8 Flash input
$0.825
At a glance

Key differences

Gemini 3.8 Flash is 79% cheaper on input tokens ($0.825 vs $4 per 1M).

Gemini 3.8 Flash has the larger context window: 1.05M vs 1M tokens.

Claude Opus 5.5 is the newer release (Sep 22, 2026, vs Sep 2, 2026).

Side by side

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash specs

SpecClaude Opus 5.5Gemini 3.8 Flash
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
ReleasedSep 22, 2026Sep 2, 2026
Context window1,000,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Input price / 1M tokens$4$0.825
Output price / 1M tokens$20$4.13
10K in + 1K out request$0.06$0.012
Acceptsfile, image, textaudio, file, image, text, video
Producestexttext
Tool callingYesYes
Structured outputsYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Popularity47/10039/100

Highlighted values are better on that spec: lower price, larger context window, newer release, or higher popularity. Prices in USD per 1M tokens as listed on OpenRouter.

FAQ

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash questions

Is Claude Opus 5.5 or Gemini 3.8 Flash cheaper?

Gemini 3.8 Flash has the lower listed input price ($0.825 per million tokens). For a request with 10,000 input and 1,000 output tokens, Claude Opus 5.5 costs about $0.06 and Gemini 3.8 Flash about $0.012.

Which has the larger context window?

Gemini 3.8 Flash supports 1,048,576 tokens, the larger of the two.

Which model should I choose?

Pick the cheaper model for high-volume, simpler tasks, and test both on a sample of your real prompts before committing. Price and context size do not measure output quality on your specific workload.