AtlasAI Center AI tool intelligence
AI model comparison

GPT-6 Luna vs Claude Opus 5.5

A side-by-side comparison of GPT-6 Luna from OpenAI and Claude Opus 5.5 from Anthropic, using published pricing, context windows, supported inputs, and release dates.

GPT-6 Luna input
$0.1
Claude Opus 5.5 input
$4
At a glance

Key differences

GPT-6 Luna is 98% cheaper on input tokens ($0.1 vs $4 per 1M).

GPT-6 Luna has the larger context window: 1.05M vs 1M tokens.

Side by side

GPT-6 Luna vs Claude Opus 5.5 specs

SpecGPT-6 LunaClaude Opus 5.5
ProviderOpenAIAnthropic
ReleasedSep 22, 2026Sep 22, 2026
Context window1,050,000 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Input price / 1M tokens$0.1$4
Output price / 1M tokens$0.5$20
10K in + 1K out request$0.0015$0.06
Acceptsfile, image, textfile, image, text
Producestexttext
Tool callingYesYes
Structured outputsYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Popularity48/10047/100

Highlighted values are better on that spec: lower price, larger context window, newer release, or higher popularity. Prices in USD per 1M tokens as listed on OpenRouter.

FAQ

GPT-6 Luna vs Claude Opus 5.5 questions

Is GPT-6 Luna or Claude Opus 5.5 cheaper?

GPT-6 Luna has the lower listed input price ($0.1 per million tokens). For a request with 10,000 input and 1,000 output tokens, GPT-6 Luna costs about $0.0015 and Claude Opus 5.5 about $0.06.

Which has the larger context window?

GPT-6 Luna supports 1,050,000 tokens, the larger of the two.

Which model should I choose?

Pick the cheaper model for high-volume, simpler tasks, and test both on a sample of your real prompts before committing. Price and context size do not measure output quality on your specific workload.