AtlasAI Center AI tool intelligence
AI model comparison

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Flash

A side-by-side comparison of Gemini 3.8 Flash from Google and Qwen3.8 Flash from Qwen, using published pricing, context windows, supported inputs, and release dates.

Gemini 3.8 Flash input
$0.825
Qwen3.8 Flash input
$0.15
At a glance

Key differences

Qwen3.8 Flash is 82% cheaper on input tokens ($0.15 vs $0.825 per 1M).

Gemini 3.8 Flash has the larger context window: 1.05M vs 1M tokens.

Gemini 3.8 Flash is the newer release (Sep 2, 2026, vs Aug 26, 2026).

Side by side

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Flash specs

SpecGemini 3.8 FlashQwen3.8 Flash
ProviderGoogleQwen
ReleasedSep 2, 2026Aug 26, 2026
Context window1,048,576 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Input price / 1M tokens$0.825$0.15
Output price / 1M tokens$4.13$0.47
10K in + 1K out request$0.012$0.002
Acceptsaudio, file, image, text, videoimage, text, video
Producestexttext
Tool callingYesYes
Structured outputsYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Popularity39/10037/100

Highlighted values are better on that spec: lower price, larger context window, newer release, or higher popularity. Prices in USD per 1M tokens as listed on OpenRouter.

FAQ

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Flash questions

Is Gemini 3.8 Flash or Qwen3.8 Flash cheaper?

Qwen3.8 Flash has the lower listed input price ($0.15 per million tokens). For a request with 10,000 input and 1,000 output tokens, Gemini 3.8 Flash costs about $0.012 and Qwen3.8 Flash about $0.002.

Which has the larger context window?

Gemini 3.8 Flash supports 1,048,576 tokens, the larger of the two.

Which model should I choose?

Pick the cheaper model for high-volume, simpler tasks, and test both on a sample of your real prompts before committing. Price and context size do not measure output quality on your specific workload.