AtlasAI Center AI tool intelligence
AI model comparison

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GLM 5.3 Flash

A side-by-side comparison of DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 from DeepSeek and GLM 5.3 Flash from Z.ai, using published pricing, context windows, supported inputs, and release dates.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 input
$0.3
GLM 5.3 Flash input
$0.0285
At a glance

Key differences

GLM 5.3 Flash is 91% cheaper on input tokens ($0.0285 vs $0.3 per 1M).

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is the newer release (Oct 17, 2026, vs Aug 26, 2026).

Side by side

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GLM 5.3 Flash specs

SpecDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GLM 5.3 Flash
ProviderDeepSeekZ.ai
ReleasedOct 17, 2026Aug 26, 2026
Context window1,048,576 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Input price / 1M tokens$0.3$0.0285
Output price / 1M tokens$1.2$0.0923
10K in + 1K out request$0.0042$0.00038
Acceptsimage, textimage, text, video
Producestexttext
Tool callingYesYes
Structured outputsYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Popularity65/10057/100

Highlighted values are better on that spec: lower price, larger context window, newer release, or higher popularity. Prices in USD per 1M tokens as listed on OpenRouter.

FAQ

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GLM 5.3 Flash questions

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or GLM 5.3 Flash cheaper?

GLM 5.3 Flash has the lower listed input price ($0.0285 per million tokens). For a request with 10,000 input and 1,000 output tokens, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs about $0.0042 and GLM 5.3 Flash about $0.00038.

Which model should I choose?

Pick the cheaper model for high-volume, simpler tasks, and test both on a sample of your real prompts before committing. Price and context size do not measure output quality on your specific workload.